Death Awareness and Organizational Behavior †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Death Awareness and Organizational Behavior. Answer: Introduction: Organisational behaviour is a relative assessment of workers influence on organisation and the impact which organisation leaves on individuals. To facilitate and stimulate the workers many factors are responsible which are complementary to each other. As a result, the performance is affected in significant manner by the surrounding environment. Furthermore, this includes tempting style of leadership traits, commensuration of corporate culture and various other characteristics at workplace. The workers perspective regarding their work performance and job area need to be carefully studied. Organisational behaviour is the sum up of prolonged mixture of actions, assertiveness and derivative from staffs learning. The prolonged combination of assertiveness and actions along with learnings derivative from the staff sums up the organisational behaviour (Stein and Cropanzano, 2011). It also provides guidance to the administrators so that the level of problems can be understood and best altern ative can be ensured by the tact of resolvance. In this way, potential errors can be cut down and productivity can be increased. The factors which leave behind the impact on nearby employees behaviour, corporate structure and levels of hierarchy are deeply scrutinized. The theory of organisational behaviour has full-grown nature due to involvement of various individual and group factors. People from diverse background such as culture, values, believe and norms are the part of the organisation. Apparently, this leads to the presence of wide range of diversity in the workplace. There are both advantages and disadvantages of cultural diversity which though rely on the presence or absence of stereotypes. Howsoever, there are multiple stages which bring along the interactive sequences comprising of prevalent culture, human intellectuality, and management techniques along with thinking capacity of the person (Alter, et. al, 2010). In order to comprehend the knowledge and practice skills of employees, understanding of their respective is important so that management practices can bring desired results. Also, the proportionate of the employees productivity is dependent upon the factors of prevalent organisation behaviour (Lynne, Jackson Russell, 2013). This essay highlights and concludes the importance of studying organisation behaviour. Apart from this extended implementat ion at varied hierarchy levels has also been addressed. Significantly, some steps are also specified which needs to be applied by management so that workforce diversity get improved along with the help of various organisational management theories. Behaviour prominent in organisation: The success of every organisation is completely dependent upon the pillars of its human resource and the qualitative output rendered by employees in cost effective manner. The behaviour of the individual is amalgamation of defined behaviour and actions of the labour force existing in the company. The newly embedded organisation behaviour has gained importance because of its capacity to build up outstanding relationship between individuals and groups. The thick line which constitutes the agenda of behaviour comprises of the individuals and group behaviour along with the prospectus of overall structure in the organisation. There are unlimited theories which influence and govern the conceptualise bindings of the organisational behaviour. In this regard, the most widely used principle theory is of the undistinguishable relationship between the employee and employers behaviour. The conventional set of various policies, goals and code of ethics with mode of conduct are projected as the bridging gap. It compliments aside the process of decision making (Kitchin, 2010). The resultant outcome is that the working environments of the organisation gets elastic and smoothen in nature. Henceforth, motivation is other critical factor which proves as a stepping stone towards the hierarchy of success. To be cost effective, the labour force must be kept highly motivated and directed towards the attainment of goals at any point of time. The degree of proper direction and control is also necessary to maintain an eye check on the quality and quantity of work done as per the required specifications. The maintenance of prop er system through which the performance could be evaluated and record is must. Various other techniques in this regard embraces of political serene, personality traits, management guidelines and elements of stress embroidery level. The theories so justified provide the intact solutions to the wide range of problems encountered (Furusten, 2013). Moreover, it includes the areas of building team spirit, training, decision making replicas and diversified amount of workings and methodology to enhance enactment guidelines. With the support of these applications changes can be implemented so that it could yield gainful and distinguished future dealings and environment ahead. Overview of Potential problems and situations Several problems are expected to occur because of the complex nature and mechanism of the organisation. This problem goes on increasing as the element of diversity in various departments keeps on bulging up. The causes for the diversity are age, gender, values, culture, belief, traditions, customs, background along with thinking abilities (Duguid and Thomas-Hunt, 2015). The magnitude of authority, accountability and responsibility are exaggerated by the consequences of diversity. The leading authorities solve the disputes and grievances on specific level, assembly level and overall operative level. Numerous issues are dealt on the account of social, ethical and cultural background. The day to day activities which take place around the organisation forms the part of social issues. These issues come into existence with the presence of surrounded society and its prolonged effects. In the similar context, the connecting environment is forecasted to have the portion of multiple issues because of the result of varied and illustrious subpopulation within (Pinder, 2014). Some of internal factors can also be the root cause of social issue likewise customs, beliefs and values attached. In order to maintain the dangerous effect of the relevant cause, proper balance and pace is required. The resultant work is differentiated on the grounds of appropriate set of beliefs and value under the broad line of ethics and code of conduct. Due to diversified nature in philosophies learnt and upbringings inculcated, there is gap in thought process of individuals as well (Briscoe, Tarique and Schuler, 2012). As a result, many problems arise since subjective curriculum of ethics is varied in nature. The gateways of joint interest shall be followed upon to end up the complexities arising from ethical issues. There has been tremendous impact of labour force cultural belongings on the organisation behaviour. People inherit the cultural learnings right from the time of birth since the surrounding in which the individual is bought up forms the constituent of culture within. The individuals thinking and behaviour is in supportive category of the respective culture. People tend to enter into manifold critical and conjoint issues because they work with diversified personalities on the same platform (Hyde, Harris and Boaden, 2013). The concerns might take the shape of customs, religion does, language, dress code, family commitments, choice of food and several other social norms. The theoretical discipline which binds the aspects of envisaging, understanding, labelling and overruling of human behaviour is addressed by organisational study (Cresswell and Sheikh, 2013). As a result of various social, ethical and cultural fundamentals the scope of organisational behaviour has grown significantly. The management needs to pay due consideration on the areas of individuals work productivity, response, nature and conduct with additional co-workers. The practices which are not legalised on the acts of biases in ethics, culture, religion and moral conduct shall be cut down. Proper channels shall be formulated which define the areas of authority and responsibility. The positive vision of stereotyping shall be implemented rather than negative one. For eg: when someone is appreciated for the skills of proficiency and competence. Likewise, women are much responsible and prone to new skills along with thought process despite of gender, age, caste, creed and religion to which they belong. As a result, many companies have the authorities which are feminine and they work outstandingly with entrepreneurial skills possessed (Rosenbusch and Cseh, 2012). When the prospectus gets biased it leads to confusion, chaos and disputes. The notion of diversification can be implemented to minimise the presence of stereotyping in the organisation. The new serene will provide labour force the exposure to accomplish the operations irrespective of sex, language, appearance, value and beliefs. The expected results will be higher level of transparency and affirmative dynamism in the structure. The negative impact comprises of the adverse mind set and beliefs which binds the mind to face the reality in actual terms. The coatings of positive aspects of stereotyping should be stretched in every possible manner. Recent developments in organisational behaviour Many guidelines, regulations and rules have been implemented by the developing organisation in order to govern the external and internal workings along with related aspects. Numerous practices of favouring diversity are promoted. Now days, people are judged on their particular quality possessed instead on the dimensions of creed, caste, race and religion. People with young mind and innovative zeal are promoted and favoured. The study of distinguished behavioural environment has been paid due consideration. The proportion of women along with their respective entrepreneurship skills are chosen and placed at MNCs (Wood, et. al, 2012). The businesses now have equal ratio of men and women in working. The conceptualization of self-governing is applied so that free zone could be created to execute individuals own control on areas of dealings. Training and recovering of timely feedback is also prominent in nature. It can be concluded that described theories shall be executed by analysing the benefits and need to be derived. The motivational and attitude facet in the organisation need to be acknowledged. Workforce should be motivated so that the quantum of productivity is maintained. The benefits which can be derived from the diversity in organisation shall be scrutinised. Proper counselling and training along with grievances in redressed mechanism can bring out the positive results. It also facilitates the delegation of task so that profit rendered is highest. At last, efforts shall be binding on the growth objectives of the organisation. References: Alter, A.L., Aronson, J., Darley, J.M., Rodriguez, C. and Ruble, D.N. (2010) Rising to the threat: Reducing stereotype threat by reframing the threat as a challenge.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,46(1), pp.166-171. Andersson, L., Jackson, S.E. and Russell, S.V., (2013) Greening organizational behavior: An introduction to the special issue.Journal of Organizational Behavior,34(2), pp.151-155. Briscoe, D., Tarique, I. and Schuler, R., (2012)International human resource management: Policies and practices for multinational enterprises. Routledge. Cresswell, K. and Sheikh, A. (2013) Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review.International journal of medical informatics,82(5), pp.e73-e86. Duguid, M.M. and Thomas-Hunt, M.C. (2015) Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes.Journal of Applied Psychology,100(2), p.343. Furusten, S. (2013) Institutional Theory and Organizational Change. Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing. Hyde, P., Harris, C. Boaden, R. (2013) Pro-social organisational behaviour of healthcare workers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), pp. 3115-3130. Kitchin, D. (2010) An Introduction to Organisational Behaviour for Managers and Engineers. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Pinder, C.C. (2014) Work motivation in organizational behaviour. Chicago: Psychology Press. Rosenbusch, K. and Cseh, M., (2012) The cross-cultural adjustment process of expatriate families in a multinational organization: A family system theory perspective.Human Resource Development International,15(1), pp.61-77. Stein, J. H. and Cropanzano, R. (2011) Death awareness and organizational behavior. Journal of organisational Behaviour, 8(1189-1193), p. 32. Wood, J., Zeffane, R., Fromholtz, M., Wiesner, R., Morrison, R. and Seet, P.S. (2012) Organisational behaviour: Core concepts and applications. Milton QLD: John Wiley Sons Australia, Ltd.